The Bible is not moral.
The Bible is not moral.
Many Christians and even people who are mildly religious often say the bible is a guidebook for morality, for a way to live on this Earth in peace with your neighbors.
Well after reading the Old Testament I’m not sure how that can be said? Here is a brief sampling of guidebook material for the reader:
- Ladies – if you are horny and there is no other man around but your father, you may sleep with him as long as you get him drunk first.
- Offering your daughters for a gang rape to an angry mob is perfectly alright as long as it prevents said mob from sodomizing your male house guests.
- If the actions of your followers cause you to drop the tablets you had just received on a mountain top from God himself, the appropriate thing to do is kill them all. Well most of them anyway. You need some followers. God will send a plague to wipe out some more just to drive the point home.
- When invading a city make sure to burn and kill everything inside the city – men, women, children, live stock, plants, buildings, everything. Oh except the gold and silver. God loves gold and silver and you should place it in his temple. But completely raze everything else.
- Don’t beat your slaves so badly that they die on the spot. If they die a day later that’s alright.
You know, I think they are right. That does sound like a great guidebook for living in peace and harmony with your neighbors. After a while the only people left will be people who believe, live and think just like you. As blueprints go it’s a very simple solution and easily followed by even the most simple minded among us.
Oh but wait. We don’t follow that Bible. That Bible is not meant to be used as a guidebook.
What!?
Isn’t the Bible the word of God Almighty? Didn’t God direct his prophets (profits) to lay down his thoughts and intentions in writing so the people could know his Word? Didn’t the Old Testament serve as a guidebook (and a very good and Just one) for hundreds upon hundreds (if not thousands) of years as THE WORD OF GOD? Why the sudden denouncement against its teachings – symbolic or otherwise?
Could it be people decided that the ways before weren’t correct? That people decided that perhaps all this killing and bloodshed wasn’t really in the best interests of living in peace? Could it be that people decided that differences among the races really weren’t a big deal anyway and they didn’t feel like warring with them anymore? Could it be that times changed and the powers that be (governments and religious types) saw the writing on the wall and needed to adjust their marketing?
Well probably not as a collective group, but subtly opinions did change and morality shifted away from absolutism and a germ of decency toward your fellow man/woman began to take root. Oh don’t get me wrong, this didn’t happen over night and as one of the people who commented to the first post stated in their talk about their deacon father not even to this day.)
I make no bones about it that Jesus was a man who lived during the Roman Empire. I think Jesus did exist but his status as Divine was merely a persona created around his myth after his death to foster a new age of religious controls. If you don’t follow me you will go to Hell. I am the Son of God (and God himself in some cases) and I will sacrifice myself for all your sins – you owe me.
It’s interesting to note that the Bible as we know it today was created by committee from a scattering of texts going back centuries. (Incidentally it should also be noted that Paul did not renounce slavery as wrong. So the New Bible didn’t correct everything.)
The Bible people read now, mostly the King James version, was started in 1604 and finished in 1611 by 54 men.(Men not women. Their place was still well established- kitchen and bedroom.) These men decided what would go into the “official” version of the Bible. There was even this huge debate about whether Jesus Christ was divine or not based on different interruptions of saviour/deliverer and other vague references - “Before Abraham was, I am.” After a narrow vote his Divinity was established. Very advanced democratic thinking for the time. Except now suddenly Jesus - a man - is a God or The God but surely not just a man wandering the earth saying nice things about people and telling people to stop stoning prostitutes.
After this time the New Testament bible was further revised by different people with different opinions of what should and shouldn’t be included. Factions split, loyalties were created and surprisingly God stayed out of the diluting of his Holy Text. God said nothing. No more burning bushes, no more divine dreams to create arks, boxes, nothing. Hmmm… I suppose he figured we’d work it out amongst ourselves. Besides he died for …. well his Son who was him, and his spirit and his Son at the same time.. or is that only just his Son and the whole trinity stuff is nonsense - misguided attempts at appeasement of the varying beliefs and people in power at the time? Regardless he died for our sins and one may assume that rewriting the Bible into many different versions of the ONLY TRUTH is covered under that atonement. (Does impregnating a woman without her consent to birth your holy child get covered under this as well? Because when you get right down to it, according to the story, God raped Mary.)
So the New Testament fixes all the morally repellent thinking of the Old Testament and dresses it up for the “modern” era. But we’ll still leave all the Old Testament stuff in there as a warning of what not to do just in case there are any doubts. That worked out very well now didn’t it?
Consider the Crusades, destruction and colonization of South American, African lands, and the North American conquest. Seems the “turn the other cheek” philosophy wasn’t useful for taking gold and silver from the heathens and some good old fashion wrath needed to be used to fire up the people.
But we don’t do that stuff today do we? We don’t go in and wipe out people because they think differently than us? (Germany WW2, Israel, Northern Ireland, Iraq (2003-??), Sino-Indian War, China)
But not in America, the most Christian nation on the planet or so we would like to believe. We would like to believe many things wouldn’t we?
No we, as a God fearing nation, just vote in politicians who retard our school systems with creationism stories. We elect presidents who suspend life saving research to cure disease because a zygote might have a soul. (Whatever that is?) And when alternative approaches are found to carry on the same research that doesn’t use aborted fetuses – placenta linings for example – we object to that as well under the grounds that we shouldn’t be playing God. So what happened to the first argument about protecting life? Was that just an emotional straw man to fire up the already converted? No one wants to harm children. But killing abortion doctors is ok?
Or we follow mega-church leaders who rack in millions upon millions of tax free dollars in the name of God and who own entire television stations, fly around on private jets and own multi-million dollar houses and have hundreds of millions of followers world wide.
Leaders whose hypocrisy is laid out in tabloid articles about gay lovers, adulterous affairs, drug addictions, and precious gems of free speech - like saying that New Orleans was flooded because God hates homosexuals. I suppose New Orleans would have been spared if everyone openly offered their daughters to any man who was thinking about sodomizing another man.
Doesn’t anyone else see a problem with this book?
And you can’t say it’s just a few bad apples tainting the opinions of the others. This behavior and group thinking has been perpetrated by people for thousands of years. How many witches were burned at the stake because the women accused didn’t submit to searches for “devil marks” in private by the priests doing the searching? How many children have been victimized by holy men in this century alone? Consider life in the Dark Ages where the use of torture was raised to near perfect forms of human suffereing. Are all these just isolated examples of a few bad apples? If you think so then you are delusional. You are ignoring facts laid out in front of you for hundreds upon hundreds of cases. These things are done by people using a system. (It’s ok to change your mind and thinking. It’s not flip-flopping, it’s openness to reality and the evidence before you. It’s listening to that little voice inside that says, this really doesn’t make any sense - why do I believe/follow this again?)
The Bible limits our morality. It restricts our free thinking as rational, conscientious beings, it limits our thrust for knowledge and understanding of the world around us and replaces it with a simple unthinking solution – God did it.
The Bible is not the word of God and the society we’ve created was created by Men using primal tools and groupthink reasoning to gain power, influence and dominance over the populace. This isn’t just for Christians but Muslims, and Judaism as well. Of course they were born out of the same soil so there’s no surprise there.
All religions, all over, are social control mechanisms used by people of power for power.
How wonderful it would be if people did things because they wanted to do them and to help their fellow man and not because it will gain them brownie points to get into “heaven”.
How wonderful it would be if people lived free of fear for imagined sins against the creator. That sex was a private matter between consenting adults and not subject to the suppressive (and yet vicarious impulses) of learned men who follow a book written over two thousand years ago.
How wonderful it would be if people pursued knowledge, thoughts and ideas without the muzzle of censorship imposed by dogma.
How much further along as a species we would be toward harmony on our planet if not for the violent hate filled views of governments and peoples formed purely by their religious beliefs and systems. (People will always hate to some degree, it hasn’t been bred out of our genes yet as needed for selfish survival instincts, but religion amplifies this hatred and gives people reasons - and worse justifications - for evil actions.)
——–
Religion is an insult
to human dignity.
With or without it
you would have
good people doing
good things and
evil people doing
evil things.
But
for good people
to do evil things,
that takes religion.
– Professor Steven Weinberg, 1999
———